Among Strange Victims by Daniel Saldaña París Page B

something that seldom occurred to him in relation to his past; his usual procedure was to brag, on every possible occasion, about the versatility of his CV : arrogantly list the nationalities of his lovers and the ideological diversity of his thesis advisors, many of whom had asked him, a posteriori, to contribute to books they were editing. The perfect mixture, in short, of an unresolved inferiority complex and a pretty face, which rather than getting uglier with age was becoming more interesting. Marcelo Valente was, even in the words of his friends, “a cretin with a PHD .”
    He was aware that his personality inspired not a little reticence. He was no longer on nodding terms with more than one professor. The academic staff of the philosophy department were on the whole, by comparison, much more serious-minded: elderly, blind seminarians who were tangled up in the thousand and one proofs of the existence of God, hangover Marxists who organized independent study groups and papered the chapel of the law department with pro-Chavist leaflets, jaundiced mathematical logicians who put their faith in the advent of the cyborgs and, to some extent, anticipated that arrival with their own mechanical existences. Marcelo didn’t belong to this realm. He had, in fact, studied art history, and only after a PHD in aesthetics at the Sorbonne had he definitely switched departments. For many academics that showed, to say the least, a lack of respect.
    Part of Marcelo’s misunderstood charm consisted of treating everyone with the same effusiveness, as if turning a deaf ear to rebuffs. This technique of overpowering friendliness ended by softening the hearts of his declared enemies. They once again invited him to congresses on the construction of aesthetic thought during the frenzied interwar years, the only area of study in which he displayed relative assurance—and disproportionate pretensions.
    Marcelo had an emotional relationship with his object of study that made him stand out among other philosophy professors. While some—the majority—dedicated themselves to the tediously monotonous repetition of anyone else’s ideas, Marcelo was convinced thatthought could be used to know something new about the world, even if that world was the limited field of the aesthetics of the avant-garde. His was not the optimism of the ignorant but that of the egomaniac, though anyone who didn’t know him could easily confuse the two.
    Marcelo Valente’s story—as should be kept in mind henceforth—has two strands: his love life and his theoretical enthusiasms. These two spheres, in his case, cannot be separated. Any attempt to narrate his Mexican experience without taking this into consideration will be unsuccessful.
    B
    In December 1917, Edmund Belafonte Desjardins—poet and boxer, boastful jewel thief, con man, art dealer, serial deserter, Australian logger, light-heavyweight champion of France, Canadian challenger in Athens, Russian exile in New York, stowaway, teenage orange picker in California, exhibitionist, Irishman living in Lausanne under a false identity, fisherman, conference lecturer, editor of a five-issue magazine, ballet dancer, dandy, boxing coach in Mexico City’s Calle Tacuba, expert on Egyptian art, buffoon, lover, liar, front man for nobody and for himself on innumerable occasions, nameless shadow, witness, minor personage in a time brimming over with great names, friend, wretch, brute—convinced Beatrice Langley to join him in Mexico, where he was scraping together a living under a pseudonym that would make him celebrated and despised, in equal measure, in the artistic milieus of Montmartre and New York: Richard Foret.
    Bea arrived in Mexico in early January 1918, and twenty-four hours later they were married. Richard had already had enough of the city, the adjoining towns, the constant altercations with gringos and locals. He had had enough of that country full of thugs where