Ghost Train to the Eastern Star

Ghost Train to the Eastern Star by Paul Theroux Page B

Book: Ghost Train to the Eastern Star by Paul Theroux Read Free Book Online
Authors: Paul Theroux
portrait of a city, about growing up in a conflicted family, the joy of reading, famous visitors, a love of solitude, the melancholy of an ancient place—the book is about how he abandoned all other ambitions to become a writer, or more than a writer.
    He was in the news. This reclusive man seemed an unlikely hero, but a few months earlier he had been in court as the defendant in one of those national trials that is like a morality play, a lion being judged by donkeys. Around that time he wrote in
The New Yorker,
"Living as I do in a country that honors its
pashas,
its saints, and policemen at every opportunity, but refuses to honor its writers until they have spent years in courts and prisons, I cannot say that I was surprised to be put on trial. I understand why friends smile and say that I am at last 'a real Turkish writer.' "
    Outsiders complain that Turkey is repressive. Turks complain too. Every shade of Islamic opinion is present in Turkish society, ranging from the most benign to the most fanatical, and every shade of secular opin
ion as well. This, I think, is the reason every visitor to Turkey finds something to like in the country and always finds a Turk to agree with.
    The odd but probably provable fact is that repression often has a salutary effect on writers, strengthening them by challenging them, making them resist, making their voices important, for at their best, writers are rebellious, and repression is the whetstone that keeps them sharp, even if the repression makes their lives miserable. A free country cannot guarantee great writing, and a public intellectual (albeit a reluctant one) like Pamuk hardly exists in Britain and the United States.
    Pamuk's crime was his mentioning to a Swiss journalist that "a million Armenians and thirty thousand Kurds were killed in this country and I'm the only one who dares to talk about it." This remark resulted in death threats, newspaper attacks, vilification, and a criminal charge of insulting the state. At his trial Pamuk faced a possible three-year sentence if he was found guilty, but the case was dropped. He was set free. He'd made his bones as a Turkish writer and he disappeared—Istanbul has that big-city quality of being a place in which you can vanish without a trace.
    Pamuk does agree to be interviewed now and then. His voice is distinctive, his manner inimitable. Here is his response to a woman from a British paper badgering him on the subject of free speech in Turkey: "Look," he said to her, "I never had any trouble writing novels. I talked about this with my publisher when we were publishing
Snow,
which was my own explicitly political novel—but then nothing happened to it. The only time I had trouble, I had trouble because of interviews, madam." Then he waggled his finger at the woman and laughed.
    He was waggling his finger now, at this dinner party, indicating one person, then another. "What do you mean by that?" "Why are you smiling?" "I find that ridiculous"
    "How did you get to Turkey?" he asked me. "Someone said, what, you took a train?"
    "Train from London. Well, four of them. Via Romania."
    When Pamuk made a face he looked years younger, indeed like a disgusted child, his glasses shifting on his wrinkled nose.
    "I was in Romania," he said. "A writers' conference, but on a boat—a sort of cruise. A whole week just sailing around with other writers."
    "It sounds awful."
    "Good answer!"
    He smiled at the news that I had glided in from Bulgaria, through the boondocks of Turkey, habituating myself, and was planning to glide east again in a few days, to Ankara and Trabzon and Hopa to Georgia.
    He said, "I have read your book about Naipaul,
Sir Vidia's Shadow
"
    "What do you think?"
    "A very affectionate book."
    "That's true, but not many people saw it."
    "Why not?"
    "I don't know. Maybe quarrels are more interesting. People said it was cruel. I'd say unsparing. The quarrelsome part of it was played up as a writers' feud. But Naipaul was an important

Similar Books

My Second Life

Faye Bird

Trusting Stone

Alexa Sinclaire

The Hunting Trip

III William E. Butterworth

Yuletide Hearts

Ruth Logan Herne

A Banquet of Consequences

Elizabeth George

Magic Can Be Murder

Vivian Vande Velde

Lady Myddelton's Lover

Evangeline Holland