sat there and tossed the ball for Misty, rousing her from her sleep and ignoring Sullivan as he said a second farewell and left Daynaâs office.
Â
7
Crime on the East End is probably no different from most of the country. Itâs mostly petty, stupid stuff committed mostly by people in various states of cognitive disrepair. Aside from the occasional flimflamâa con man posing as a European count, say, fleecing both bankers and benefactorsâitâs all the usual stuff. Fistfights over parking spots, kleptomania, secret vendettas gone awry, public urination, purloined Pomeranians, et cetera.
The only police matter of genuine local interest that winter, and much more interesting to the cops than anyone else, was a string of exotic car thefts. For the last three winters, person or persons unknown were boosting Porsches, Aston Martins, Bentleys, and expensive collectibles like Packards, Morgans, and Cords from where the wealthy had left them in the garages of their summer homes, unneeded in the city and virtually forgotten until the start of the high season.
This was not a crime wave that engendered an outpouring of public sympathy. Most in town figured the owners were selling the cars to South American drug cartels and claiming the insurance loss. This is the type of loony conspiracy theory indulged in by our locals when discussing the wealthy city people, about whom they knew next to nothing. I knew enough to know city people had far more lucrative and efficient ways of acquiring ill-gotten gains than anything as ridiculous as that.
So unless it was the peak of the season and celebrities were out and about flashing their summer plumage, the Hamptons rarely attracted the interest of the outside media. The last event to make national news was a car bombing in East Hampton, which everyone assumed at the time was an act of international terrorism. It wasnât, as it turned out. So the interest quickly died down. Except on my part, since I was there when it happened, getting nearly blown up along with the car.
As in most places, however, sensational murders were rare, so despite our off-season obscurity, the death of Tad Buczek prompted a call to my office that morning from The New York Times . I hadnât heard from these folks since the car bombing, so I didnât completely believe it at first.
âCome again?â I asked.
âRoger Angstrom, New York Times ,â he repeated. âIâm looking for a comment on the Buczek killing. This guy Raffini worked for him, right? Have the police established a motive yet?â
âThere is no motive.â
âThere isnât?â
âThereâs no motive because Franco didnât kill him,â I said.
âWhat makes you say that?â
âIâm his defense attorney. I only defend innocent people. And I donât comment on active cases.â
âYou sort of just did. You said Raffini was innocent.â
âOkay, but thatâs as far as I go.â
âI was thinking about driving out there this afternoon. Could you meet with me for a few minutes?â
âProbably not,â I said.
âIâll have other peopleâs opinions. You might want a voice if you disagree with what they said.â
âWhy are you interested in this?â
âIâm a crime reporter. Itâs what they pay me to do. I write about the innocent and the guilty, but I try to be as fair and accurate as I can. Defense attorneys generally like that.â
Why does the fear of being manipulated always cause me to spur the manipulator on to greater effort? Itâs like I step out of my body and look back at myself diving for the obvious bait.
âWhat little Iâve experienced with the press has rarely featured both âfairâ and âaccurateâ in the same story,â I said.
âThatâs because youâve never worked with me.â
âWeâd be working together? I thought you
The Cowboy's Surprise Bride