it was at least two hundred years old. I gave Christy the paperwork with the details. She put together a description that we can display with the desk at the auction. Itâs valued at more than a thousand dollars, so Iâve suggested twelve hundred as the minimum bid. Weâll see who of the trifling fools we went to high school with has that kind of money.â
âThatâs nice of you to donate it,â I say, wondering what her angle is. Raynell is not the kind of person who does things out of the goodness of her heart. Maybe sheâs tried to sell it and canât, or maybe sheâs lying about its worth . . . who knows.
âItâs nothing. And honestly Iâll be glad to have it out of my house. Iâm all about clean lines and modern furniture. This thing just clashes with my whole decorating theme.â
âWhat made you buy it if itâs so dissimilar to the rest of your décor?â
âOh, Iâm always picking up things that I think might have valueânot necessarily to keep. One of the perks of being a real estate agent is I often get first dibs on the possessions divorcing couples are trying to get rid of. They put their house on the market after the divorce papers are filed. Often one of the spouses will sell me things below market value just to be spitefulâthe stories I could tell. Thereâs less drama on an episode of Scandal than in some of my business dealings with couples whoâve decided to separate.â She looks to the right of the desk. âI bought that painting from the same client who sold me the desk.â Raynell points to what can only be described as a stunning portrait of a young black woman in a lovely one-shoulder evening gown. Sheâs poised in front of an old-fashioned microphone. The painting manages to capture her both singing and smiling at the same time. It immediately makes me think of the 1940s . . . or maybe the early fifties.
âWow,â I say. âWhat a beautiful painting . . .â My voice trails off as I realize that beautiful doesnât really do it justice. âExquisite . . . itâs truly exquisite,â I add as I think about what a shame it is to see it just sitting on the floor leaning against a bookcase rather than being displayed on the wall.
âMeh,â Raynell says, unimpressed. âItâs worthless, and I overpaid for it. Iâm not sure if Iâll keep it.â
âWho is the painting of? She looks familiar.â
âSarah Vaughan. Apparently, she was a jazz singer or something back in the day.â
âSarah Vaughan!â I exclaim. âMy mother played her version of âSend in the Clownsâ when I was a kid. She had an amazing voice. I remember Momma referring to her as âThe Divine One.â â
âI thought her heyday was more in the forties and fifties.â
âHer career spanned decades. I only know because Momma is a big fan. âIf You Could See Me Nowâ was another big song of hersâthatâs a really old one I think . . . from the forties, maybe.â
âWell, apparently sheâs dead.â
âShe must be dead for more than twenty years now.â
âYouâd think that would make the painting worth somethingâeven if it isnât a Keckley.â
âKeckley?â
âI thought the painting might be an original Keckley. Arthur Keckley was a well-known black artist who painted portraits of performers at the Lincoln Theatre on U Street in D.C. during its prime. He painted all the greats: Duke Ellington, Pearl Bailey, Ella Fitzgerald, Cab Calloway, Billie Holiday . . . and I was hoping that this one was the rendition he did of Sarah Vaughan.â
âItâs not, I take it?â
âNo. I had Christy find me an appraiser. He evaluated the desk as well. I was actually more excited about the painting, but it turns out only the desk has any real value. And even that is only
Susan Aldous, Nicola Pierce