again.
II
When approached by young people in search of wisdom about how they might go about linking up with someone with whom they are likely to enjoy a long and happy marriage, the only strategy I can divine from what passed for my wife-seeking activities is âWander into the right party.â
âFamily Man
The party was thrown in late 1963 by
Monocle,
a doomed magazine of political satire.
Monocle
âs parties seemed to grow more elaborate as its financial situation became increasingly bleak. Three or four other couples with connections to
Monocle
met and eventually married; those unions, which we called â
Monocle
marriagesâ in our house, were all long-lasting. I have reminded the founder of
Monocle
âVictor Navasky, who is fortunate enough to have a
Monocle
marriage himselfâthat his brainchild proved to be more durable as a marriage brokerage than as a magazine. In Aliceâs view,
Monocle
had existed in order to get everyone married, a project that might well require larger and larger parties, and, once that had occurred, it quite naturally folded.
When I saw Alice at that
Monocle
party, she was wearing a hat. At least, Iâve always remembered her as wearing a hat. She later insisted that sheâd never owned a hat of the sort I described. Maybe, but I can still see her in the hatâa white hat, cocked a bit to the side. Her cheeks were slightly flushed. She had blond hair, worn straight in those days, and a brow just a shade darker than her hair. (Our oldest grandchild, Isabelle Alice, who was born in 2002, has precisely that coloring, which may be one reason I sometimes have trouble taking my eyes off her.) Whether or not Alice was wearing a hat was not the only difference in the way we recalled that meeting. Aliceâs father had grown up in rural North Carolina, in a Southern Baptist family named Stewart, but her mother was Jewishâa fact that was to come as a great relief to my own Jewish mother, once I reminded her that, according to the ancient Hebraic belief in matrilineal descent, anyone whose mother was Jewish is herself Jewish. Although some people thought that Alice looked like the quintessential
shiksa,
I always claimed that when I spotted her across the room that night I asked Navasky, âWhoâs that cute little Jewish girl over by the punch bowl?â Alice always said that Iâd made up that story and that, furthermore, there wasnât any punch bowl.
She was, as Roger Wilkins later wrote, so very pretty, but that wasnât the first thing that struck me about her; it might have come as much as two or three seconds later. My first impression was that she looked more alive than anyone Iâd ever seen. She seemed to glow. For one reason or another, I barely got to speak to her that evening. Two weeks later, though, after doing some intelligence work and juggling some obligations and dismissing as hearsay the vague impression of one mutual acquaintance that Alice was virtually engaged, I dashed back from a remote suburb to a party that I figured sheâd be attending. So I couldnât claim that I just wandered into that second party; in romantic matters, even those who need to depend mainly on dumb luck are usually up to one or two deliberate moves. At the second party, I did get to talk to her quite a lot. In fact, I must have hardly shut up. I was like a lounge comic who had been informed that a booker for
The Tonight Show
was in the audience. Recalling that party in later years, Alice would sometimes say, âYou have never again been as funny as you were that night.â
âYou mean I peaked in December of 1963?â Iâd say, twenty or even thirty years later.
âIâm afraid so.â
But I never stopped trying to match that eveningânot just trying to entertain her but trying to impress her. Decades laterâafter we had been married for more than thirty-five years, after our girls were grownâI
Norah Wilson, Heather Doherty