INTRODUCTION
WHY IâM WRITING ABOUT CONSPIRACIES IN AMERICA
First of all, letâs talk about what you wonât find in this book. Itâs not about how extraterrestrials are abducting human beings, or the Apollo moon landing being a colossal hoax perpetrated by NASA, or that Barack Obama somehow is not a natural-born American citizen. I leave these speculations to others, not that I take them seriously. What this book will delve into are a number of things you donât see on TV or read about in the papers. The fact is, the mediaâthe fourth branch of government that our founding fathers anticipated would speak truth to power and keep our democracy on trackâhas at least since the assassination of President Kennedy systematically ignored any âconspiracy theoryâ that might rock the Establishmentâs boat. We are, excuse my French, in deep shit today because of this head-in-the-sand mentality.
Letâs start out by defining what a conspiracy is. My 2,347-page Websterâs New Universal Unabridged Dictionary says: âa planning and acting together secretly, especially for an unlawful or harmful purpose, such as murder or treason.â Synonyms include plot, cabal, connivance, collusion. Hard to swallow? Think of the Roman senators who knocked off Julius Caesar in 44 B.C. But I guess weâve come a long way since then, right? Think Operation Northwoods, circa 1962. Weâll get to that in due courseâ Seven Days in May , that novel about a military takeover during the Kennedy years, wasnât far off the mark.
Clearly, thereâs something going on in our national psyche that the New York Times and the Washington Post donât want to examine. Look at the popularity of The X-Files , or Mel Gibson in the movie Conspiracy Theory . Not that I think we should all booby-trap our doors and hide behind our file cabinets, but sometimes those âlone nutsâ turn out to be right! Iâm tired of being told that anybody who questions the status quo is part of the disaffected, alienated element of our society that ought to wake up and salute the flag. Maybe being patriotic is about raising the curtain and wondering whether weâve really been told the truth about things like September 11.
I guess my questioning of the âofficialâ line goes back to my school days, being taught that we had to fight in Vietnam to stop the domino effect of Communism. Thatâs what I learned in school, but my fatherâwho was a World War II vetâtook the exact opposite position at the dinner table. He said that was a load of crap, that the Vietnam War was all about somebody making big money off it. At first I thought my dad was crazy, because I could not believe they would lie to me in school. I fought with him over it, and heâd keep doing his best to debunk what I was saying.
When I, in turn, went into the service and learned a whole lot more about Vietnam, I had the good fortune to come home and tell my father that he was right. Especially growing up in the Midwest, you never even contemplate that your government might not be telling the truth. You donât realize until you get much older that government is nothing but peopleâand people lie, especially where money and power are concerned.
The next prong in the fork was, when I got out of the navy and went to junior college one year, Mark Lane came to give a talk and I happened to hear him that night. That was the first time I ever paid attention to someone saying that what they told us about President Kennedyâs assassination might not be true. Iâd been in junior high school when JFK was shot, and I remember the announcement over the loudspeakers and being sent back to our homerooms and then school was dismissed. Like most everybody else, I saw Jack Ruby shoot Lee Harvey Oswald on TV, but I never questioned the Warren Commissionâs report that this disaffected ex-Marine had acted alone.
After
James Patterson and Maxine Paetro