Beyond that, Keiko himself was also
strangely different from any other male killer whale I had ever known. There seemed
to be no limit to his acceptance of anyone or anything. From all that I learned and
was told, from everything that I saw, Keiko did not possess an aggressive bone in
his body. His disposition with people was more akin to that of a big mellow Saint
Bernard than any form of apex predator. These characteristics were intriguing and
at the same time deeply troubling. At any other time or place, I would have been thrilled
to be working with such a remarkable individual.
However, we weren’t there to build a lasting relationship with the animal. We were
there to prepare him for a life in the North Atlantic. That life would require diverse
new skills. Of pivotal importance, it would require the absence of human relationships.
No, in fact it would demand that he develop relationships with his wild counterparts,
something over which all our preparation could have no influence. It was impossible
not to like the Big Man, but beneath the excitement of meeting Keiko, ran a profoundly
disturbing and dark current. I worried for this animal; I worried that what made him
such an incredible animal to those around him would be his Achilles’ heel, the downfall
of his ability to succeed on his own.
3
The Enemy Within
E-mail: April 29, 1999
To: Alyssa
Subj: Update (morning)
We meet with Charles on next Tuesday or Wednesday. We are frantically getting our
sh-t together. All is going well enough though. I feel so at home with a KW … so very
familiar … it didn’t take two days or even one … I felt natural and at ease after
the third minute. Great feeling (amidst the foreignness of everything else). This
facility is awesome and the view is unbelievable … beautiful weather today
.
Until then, I love and miss you. Mark
Dave, my counterpart on the implementation of our outlined plan, was scheduled to
arrive just a day before Charles Vinick, the chief operations officer for the Keiko
Release Project. We would have only one day together on the bay pen with Keiko before
meetings with Charles would begin. Although Robin and I had spent considerable time
analyzing every aspect of Keiko’s reintroduction and our proposal, I had much more
hands-on time in the application of behavioral modification with Dave from our years
of working side-by-side at SeaWorld. We each knew the other’s strengths and weaknesses
while also practiced in exercising each other’s intellectual limits on the finer points
of applied behavioral science.
From my own experiences, I had categorized three basic types of animal trainer: the
“Relationship Trainer,” the “Scientist,” and the “Poet Philosopher.” Relationship
Trainers have a special knack for building relationships with animals. In other words,
animals like to work with these trainers. More often than not, Relationship Trainers
don’t have a solid grasp of the science of behavioral modification and can’t explain
(very well) to others how they get results. Nonetheless, they are able to achieve
an amazing rapport due in large part to their genuine affection and interaction with
the animals in their care.
The Scientist Trainers approach animal behavior from a textbook perspective. They
know the mechanics of how behavior is shaped. The Scientists don’t have the best relationship
with the animals and often face their own frustration; frustration that comes from
the missing link provided through genuine affection. The best scientists recognize
that developing a relationship with the animal they are training is a fundamental
tool and requirement in the behavioral modification process, but this understanding
is clinical. Cold application as a tool in shaping behavior, regardless of accuracy,
does not a genuine bond make. Animals pick up on this, and their interest and motivation
to work with the
Susan Sontag, Victor Serge, Willard R. Trask
Robert Jordan, Brandon Sanderson