Our Own Devices: How Technology Remakes Humanity by Edward Tenner Page A

247–69.
    34. Alan S. Ryan, “The Resurgence of Breastfeeding in the United States,”
Pediatrics
, vol. 99, no. 4 (April 1997), E12—E16; Marc Kaufman, “What’s in Infant Formula?”
Washington Post
, June 1, 1999.
    35. Kaufman, “Infant Formula,” 13; Marc Kaufman, “Baby Formula Fight Puts FatUnder Fire,”
Washington Post
, June 1, 1999.
    36. Karen Goldberg Goff, “To Baby’s Health,”
Washington Times
, August 18, 2002; Isadora B. Steylin, “Infant Formula: Second Best but Good Enough,”
FDA Consumer
, vol. 30, no. 5 (June 1996), 17–20.
    37. Alan Lucas, letter,
British Medical Journal
, vol. 317, no. 7174 (August 1, 1998), 337–38; Glen E. Mott et al., “Programming of Cholesterol Metabolismby Breast or Formula Feeding,” in
The Childhood Environment and Adult Disease
(Chichester, Eng.: John Wiley & Sons, 1991), 56–76; Golden,
Wet Nursing
, 206; Janet Raloff, “Breast Milk: A Leading Source of PCBs,”
Science News
, vol. 152, no. 22 (November 29, 1997), 344.
    38. Jill Nelson, “Mr. Mom Finally Gets It All,”
Washington Post
, September 27, 1987.
    39. On the technology and politics of contemporarybreast-feeding, see Linda M. Blum,
At the Breast: Ideologies of Breastfeeding and Motherhood in the Contemporary United States
(Boston: Beacon Books, 1999); for a new feminist interpretation, see Alison Bartlett, “Breastfeeding as Headwork: Corporeal Feminism and Meanings for Breastfeeding,”
Women’s Studies International Forum
, vol. 25, no. 3 (May—June 2002), 373–82.
    40. Terence Chea, “Martekto Feed Market for Fortified Formula; Do Additives Make Babies Smarter? Studies Differ,”
Washington Post
, January 24, 2002; Eric Nagourney, “Vital Signs: Nutrition, Extra Fortification for Baby Formulas,”
New York Times
, January 29, 2002; Nicholas B. Kristof, “Interview with a Humanoid,”
New York Times
, July 23, 2002.
CHAPTER THREE
    1. William Rossi, “Back to Basics—Again and Again,”
FootwearNews
, vol. 54, no. 36 (September 7, 1998), 24; Eunice Wilson,
A History of Shoe Fashions
(London: Pitman, 1974), 36–37; Harold E. Driver and William C. Massey,
Comparative Studies of North American Indians
(Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1957) (=
Transactions of the American Philosophical Society
, n.s. vol. 47, part 2); Alika Podolinsky Webber,
North American Indian and Eskimo Footwear:A Typology and Glossary
(Toronto: Bata Shoe Museum, 1989).
    2. Phillip Nutt, electronic mail to author, August 20, 2002; David Foster Wallace, “Shipping Out,”
Harper’s
, vol. 292, no. 1748 (January 1996), 33; Brian Dibble, “Synonyms for
Zori
,”
American Speech
, vol. 54, no. 1 (Spring 1979), 79.
    3. “Put Your Best Foot Forward,”
Current Health
2, vol. 27, no. 4 (December 1997), 28–29; Todd R. Olsonand Michael R. Seidel, “The Evolutionary Basis of Some Clinical Disorders of the Human Foot: A Comparative Survey of the Living Primates,”
Foot and Ankle
, vol. 3, no. 6 (May—June 1983), 322–41; Frank R. Wilson,
The Hand
(New York: Pantheon Books, 1998), 318n2; Félix Regnault, “Le Pied Préhensile chez l’Homme,”
Bulletins et Mémoires
(Société Anthropologique de Paris), 5th ser., vol. 10 (1909),41–42.
    4. William A. Rossi, “The Foot’s Arches: Myth vs. Fact: Do Arch Inserts Play the Best Supporting Role?”
Footwear News
, vol. 52, no. 20 (May 13, 1996), 14; Kelley Ann Hays-Gilpin, Ann Cordy Deegan, and Elizabeth Ann Morris,
Prehistoric Sandalsfrom Northeastern Arizona: The Earl H. Morris and Ann Axtell Morris Research
, Anthropological Papers of the University of Arizona, 62 (Tucson: Universityof Arizona Press, 1998), 38; Earle T. Engle and Dudley J. Morton, “Notes on Foot Disorder Among Natives of the Belgian Congo,”
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
, vol. 13 (April 1931), 311–18; Shanghai data from Rossi, above.
    5. “Discalced Orders,”
New Catholic Encyclopedia
(New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967), vol. 4, 893; Friedrich Engels,
The Condition of the Working