Depending on how you choose to look at it.â She tried to avoid looking at the photographs of the two children. It was as if they were reproaching her for not wanting to get involved.
âIn Norway thereâs always some kind of connection between people,â she said. âEspecially when you live as close together as Asker and Bærum. You must have experienced that yourself. I mean, when you sit down and start talking to someone. You nearly always have a mutual acquaintance, an old friend, somewhere youâve both worked, an experience in common. Itâs true, isnât it?â
âUm, yes . . .â
He paused. He seemed uninterested. Then he suddenly took a deep breath as if he were about to protest, but stopped himself.
âI need someone to construct a profile,â he said instead. âA profiler.â
His English pronunciation was broad, like an American TV series.
âHardly,â Johanne interjected. The conversation was heading in a direction she did not like. âIf you are to going to benefit atall from a profiler, you need more cases than this. Assuming that we are actually dealing with one and the same person.â
âGod forbid,â said Adam Stubo. âThat there should be more cases, I mean.â
âObviously I agree with you on that. But itâs more or less impossible to draw any conclusions based on two cases.â
âHow do you know that?â
âElementary logic,â she replied sharply. âItâs obvious . . . The profile of an unknown criminal is based on the known common features of his crimes. Itâs like one of those dot-to-dot drawings. Your pencil follows the numbered points until there is a clear picture. It doesnât work with only two points. You need more. And on that point, you are absolutely right: letâs hope and pray that it doesnât happen. That more points appear, I mean.â
âWhat makes you say that?â
âWhy do you insist that this is one and not two cases?â
âI donât think itâs any coincidence that you chose to study psychology and law. An unusual combination. You must have had a plan. A goal.â
âComplete coincidence, in fact. A result of youthful fickleness. And I also wanted to go to the States. And you know . . .â
She discovered that she was biting her hair. As discreetly as possible, she pushed the wet lock of hair behind her ear and straightened her glasses.
âI think youâre wrong. Emilie Selbu and little Kim were not abducted by the same man.â
âOr woman.â
âOr woman,â she repeated, exasperated. âBut now, however rude it may be, Iâm going to have to ask you to . . . I have quite a lot I need to do today, because Iâm . . . Sorry.â
Again she felt that pressure on her lungs; it was impossible to look at the man on the sofa. He got up from his uncomfortable position with remarkable ease.
âIf it happens again,â he said, gathering up the photographs. âIf another child is taken, will you help me then?â
Cruella de Vil screeched from the study. Kristiane shrieked with delight.
âI donât know,â said Johanne Vik. âWeâll see.â
*
As it was Saturday and the project was going according to plan, he treated himself to a glass of wine. When he thought about it, he realised that it was the first time for months that heâd had alcohol. Normally, he was worried about the effects. A glass or two made him docile. Then halfway through the third he would get angry. Fury waited at the bottom of the fourth glass.
Just one glass. It was still light outside and he held the wine up to the light.
Emilie was difficult. Ungrateful. Even though he wanted to keep the girl alive, for the moment at least, there were limits.
He took a sip. It tasted musty; the wine tasted of cellars.
He had to smile at his own sentimentality. He was just too emotional. He was too
William K. Klingaman, Nicholas P. Klingaman
John McEnroe;James Kaplan