it.â
âYou saw it in the hallânot the bedroom.â
âWhat difference does that make?â
âWell, itâs queer, isnât it? Why should Halliday say he strangled his wife in the bedroom if he actually strangled her in the hall?â
âOh, I donât know. Thatâs just a minor detail.â
âIâm not so sure. Pull your socks up, darling. There are some very funny points about the whole setup. Weâll take it, if you like, that your father did strangle Helen. In the hall. What happened next?â
âHe went off to Dr. Kennedy.â
âAnd told him he had strangled his wife in the bedroom, brought him back with him and there was no body in the hallâ or in the bedroom. Dash it all, there canât be a murder without a body. What had he done with the body?â
âPerhaps there was one and Dr. Kennedy helped him and hushed it all upâonly of course he couldnât tell us that.â
Giles shook his head.
âNo, GwendaâI donât see Kennedy acting that way. Heâs a hardheaded, shrewd, unemotional Scotsman. Youâre suggesting that heâd be willing to put himself in jeopardy as an accessory after the fact. I donât believe he would. Heâd do his best for Halliday by giving evidence as to his mental stateâthat, yes. But why should he stick his neck out to hush the whole thing up? Kelvin Halliday wasnât any relation to him, nor a close friend. It was his own sister who had been killed and he was clearly fond of herâeven if he did showslight Victorian disapproval of her gay ways. Itâs not, even, as though you were his sisterâs child. No, Kennedy wouldnât connive at concealing murder. If he did, thereâs only one possible way he could have set about it, and that would be deliberately to give a death certificate that she had died of heart failure or something. I suppose he might have got away with thatâbut we know definitely that he didnât do that. Because thereâs no record of her death in the Parish registers, and if he had done it, he would have told us that his sister had died. So go on from there and explain, if you can, what happened to the body.â
âPerhaps my father buried it somewhereâin the garden?â
âAnd then went to Kennedy and told him heâd murdered his wife? Why? Why not rely on the story that sheâd âleft himâ?â
Gwenda pushed back her hair from her forehead. She was less stiff and rigid now, and the patches of sharp colour were fading.
âI donât know,â she admitted. âIt does seem a bit screwy now youâve put it that way. Do you think Dr. Kennedy was telling us the truth?â
âOh yesâIâm pretty sure of it. From his point of view itâs a perfectly reasonable story. Dreams, hallucinationsâfinally a major hallucination. Heâs got no doubt that it was a hallucination because, as weâve just said, you canât have a murder without a body. Thatâs where weâre in a different position from him. We know that there was a body.â
He paused and went on: âFrom his point of view, everything fits in. Missing clothes and suitcase, the farewell note. And later, two letters from his sister.
Gwenda stirred.
âThose letters. How do we explain those?â
âWe donâtâbut weâve got to. If we assume that Kennedy was telling us the truth (and as I say, Iâm pretty sure that he was), weâve got to explain those letters.â
âI suppose they really were in his sisterâs handwriting? He recognized it?â
âYou know, Gwenda, I donât believe that point would arise. Itâs not like a signature on a doubtful cheque. If those letters were written in a reasonably close imitation of his sisterâs writing, it wouldnât occur to him to doubt them. Heâs already got the preconceived idea that
Dan Bigley, Debra McKinney