to us if we hadnât had the spur of the sentence in the journal. So, as memories may need to be remembered to hold fast as structures in the brain, this is a good thing in itself. But weâve become convinced that an evolutionary accident has left us in the curious state of having brains that can remember huge, huge amounts of incident; but we have no good recall mechanisms in us to go back and get them, so they sit there as knots or configurations of synapses, doing nothing but waiting. Very strange.
As for journals, I love the journals of Henry David Thoreau and Virginia Woolf, and often feel they are the whole story as far as literature goes; they are novels written as first person hyperrealist accounts of a single consciousness, say. And we donât have any other novels that come even close to doing what they do as far as getting inside the head of another human beingâexcept possibly for Proustâs novel. So they are considerable works of literature in that sense and I often wonder if a journal would be the best way to go if you were intent to do this particular thing, which it seems to me most literature does indeed want to do. But neither Woolf nor Thoreau had kids. Thereâs a time problem here, and also it takes a certain mentality to keep at it year after year, which is what is required. Also, with both of them, when really bad things happened, their journals went silent, usually for months and sometimes for years. So there seems to be some kind of problem there with what the journal can actually face up to, as a form. Maybe.
I know that you write and publish poetry. Have you published outside the SF field? Have you published fiction outside the field?
No, all my poetry is stuck inside my stories and books. It helps me to think of my poems as being by someone else. And all my fiction has been published in SF magazines or books, although sometimes brought out as âgeneral fiction,â by my publisher, but booksellers know which section to put it in after itâs off the front tables.
Are there special âchopsâ for writing SF? Are there ways in which SF is less demanding?
I donât know, I guess there are some techniques particular to SF, maybe the ways in which the future background is conveyed, or something like that. I canât imagine itâs less demanding than any other kind of fiction, it feels about as demanding as I can handle, anyway. My near future and my farther future stories feel about the same in terms of writing, although I will say that when I came back from years on Mars to write about Antarctica, it was a huge relief to have other people making up the culture for me, rather than trying to do it all myself. In that sense I think SF is a bit harder. But itâs all hard, and none of it is ârealism,â so I think distinctions here are very fuzzy.
What part of the process of writing fiction do you like best? Least? Is there a process to writing fiction?
I like the writing. These days I write only novels, and I like most the last three to six months of writing a novel, when I bear down and really go at it like a maniac. There is a real joy to be had in submitting to a task like a madman. It feels like things are coming together, and the process is one of identifying problems and then solving them on the spot, and then moving on. So there is a problem-solving aspect to it that reminds me of hiking cross country in Sierra, where every step is a decision, like every word coming up in a sentence. You get into a flow and then itâs problem, solution, problem, solution, and that goes on at a smooth good pace for a long time, and at the end youâre somewhere else. Often when in this flow state I will have a couple of hours pass and it feels like only about fifteen minutes have passed, and that I take it is the blessed state, the Zen state, prayer, what have you. Writing as hiking a prayer.
The part I like least.... Well, first draft when faced
William K. Klingaman, Nicholas P. Klingaman
John McEnroe;James Kaplan