C ORRESPONDENCE
I drive around in my small, old Honda Civic
and play music that reminds me of driving
the same car when it was new but no larger.
The Civic held four people, but now, with the car seat
and its five-point safety harness, it holds three.
There are Goldfish crackers ground into the floor mats.
My husband is the bassist in a local bar band.
They play classic rock covers, and though my husband
hates classic rock, he loves his powder-blue bass.
He loves playing in a band. He loves when Frank,
the owner of the bar, gets drunk and tells the band
how much he loves them. They have a monthly gig.
He makes fifty dollars a night when he plays 622.
There are things that are broken beyond repair,
but my marriage isnât one of them.
I am not telling you any of this.
Everything I am telling you is in that letter.
I will not tell you about the fact that I thought
praying mantises were an endangered species
when I was a kid. That was in the seventies.
If I think too much about my childhood,
I will feel too old to write you a letter.
The Internet tells me that this is a long-standing
urban legend; killing a praying mantis was never
illegal or subject to a fine. The origin of the myth
is unknown. Mantises are beneficial to gardens they live in.
Here it seems to make sense to evoke Eden,
but I wonât. My son loves praying mantises.
He goes outside each night after dinner to
look for guys
,
and finds them tucked into the spiky barberry bushes.
I will not write you about my son, and if I mention
Eden, it would be to tell you that thereâs no such thing.
That you are not the talking snake and I am not
the woman without clothes who offers and offers.
The apple has no knowledge to give us. Our cosmogony
is unclear. This is not a love note, or a prayer,
or a field equation. I hold my cards close to the vest.
You send me a picture of a tattoo youâd like to get
of a compass, and the road unravels in front of my Civic
like a spool of thread. We are a gravitational singularity,
a theory that implicates epistemology, but I am not
rigorous enough in my approach to uncover anything.
You write me a letter.
I write you a letter back.
We go on like this for some time.
WITH/OUT
after Janice N. Harrington
And the mornings were detritus,
bent bottle caps, chrome diner matchbooks,
always the pack of playing cards in cellophane
with the tab half-pulled, and the unearthed voice
of the drive-thru pricked by shined key chains
jangling like tire irons. And the nights were detritus,
expired gas station receipts, mall vapors, a half-used
tin of tattoo salve, all of Bayonne, New Jersey
mapped on your back in chalk. The moon was detritus,
shining on a pickup dodging the curb, trailing nail clippings,
onion skins, translucent stars, five beat-down Nikes
that wound up phone-pole hopping in Ditmas.
And you were the detritus of magnifying glasses,
half-done lanyards, award ribbons fluttering
like condom wrappers at the shore, the wreckage
of contour lines, a hand-tooled leather souvenir
from a red rock abyss. The scent of your drawer
was fresh rubber and guitar picks, the metallurgy
of scattered loose change and blood. Your bed
wore charcoal detritus, lip-gloss and pot-dust,
ill-fitted sheets. And the detritus the July heat let loose:
gnawed Bic pen caps, a glowing Duncan Hines yo-yo
tangled in dead 9-volt connectors and envelopes
whose lips sealed shut from humidity that swelled
the windows into their frames. If you had scrawled
something on the inside of my wrist back then
it might have been a Venn diagram: your contented breath,
six glove-box necessities, the muffled places detritus would take us.
S TAKING A C LAIM
It seems a certain fear underlies everything.
If I were to tell you something profound
it would be useless, as every single thing I know
is not timeless. I am particularly risk-averse.
I choose someone else over me every