she’s found another way to squeeze money out of her
guests, I guess.”
“She’s an evil genius,” I laughed.
Charlie Fiorella made his way to the car and looked at me
over the open door. “Hey. That’s my employer you’re talking
about. I prefer to think of her as a fearsome yet creative pres-
ence.” He gave me a grin and drove away.
I spent most of that day getting organized and dreaming up
a strategy. I had some biographical stuff on Westmann and a
list of all his book publications. I’d also searched the Internet
for any related sites that could flesh out his profile. I got into
some on-line archives that had old reviews of each of his works.
I did a lot of cutting and pasting and saving stuff to disk.
But I knew that I was simply dodging the inevitable. Even-
tually, I was actually going to have to read all the stuff he wrote.
I had a vague recollection of looking at his books years ago
when I was young and impressionable. Even then, as naïve as
I was, I had put Westmann’s work down, convinced that the
guy was a fraud. And I had seen nothing in the literature from
the academic community that suggested anything different.
Yet it was a type of opinion that was widely held even though
the reasons were not particularly well documented. People had
suggested that Westmann had recycled excerpts from various
obscure tomes, fit them together into an outlandish fantasy of
his own making, and then tried to pass it off as scholarship.
In some ways it was a beautiful scheme. The world of aca-
demia is like most other worlds—filled with fine people, but
also with its share of freaks and phonies. Mainstream schol-
ars dismissed Westmann, but somewhere in the few thousand
obscure little colleges around the country you could always
64
Kage
find some charlatan with a shaky Ph.D. who’d defend what one
book dust jacket described as “a groundbreaking exploration
of a secret world of mystic warriors, penned by a courageous
scholar.”
In the post-modern academic world, truth is often alleged
to be relative. Westmann’s stuff didn’t seem plausible? Who are
we to denigrate an individual’s unique perspective? Nobody
seemed to be able to substantiate his claims? Nobody could
locate the leader of the secret society who was his main infor-
mant? Easily explained. It’s a secret society.
It all made me roll my eyes. Serious readers with any famil-
iarity with the topic would simply dismiss Westmann’s stuff.
And few people would have the need or the time to do a very
thorough research job to prove or disprove his veracity. Only a
nut would devote any time to this.
Or someone in the pay of Westmann’s daughter.
I sighed and pulled his books off the shelf, lining up cop-
ies of reviews for each of them. Then I went back to the Web,
tried to track the book reviewers down, and e-mailed a message
outlining my purpose to the ones who were still alive, asking
whether they could point me in any direction. No sense rein-
venting the wheel.
The task was uninspiring and I grew antsy. I looked out
through the wall of glass at the shifting patterns on the des-
ert floor below me. I thought about the group from the hotel.
Maybe a little hike to end the day?
The van with the tourists was long gone. I headed over to
the gravel path that led out into the rough terrain around the
property. A finely-crafted wooden sign with a vaguely Indian
stick figure pointed the way onward. Who was I to argue?
The sun was dropping down and the wind, while hot,
65
John Donohue
offered the illusion of relief. I wandered down the track, think-
ing of nothing in particular, just glad to be moving. I could see
boot prints from the tourist group in the dust on the path. It
wound up and down slight inclines. In a few places, it paralleled
the edge of the ridge to permit panoramic views of the desert
floor. The rocks around me were awash in the rose-orange glow
of a setting sun, silent
John Hill, Aka Dean Koontz